Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [RFC] of: Allow for experimental device tree bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> > I'd even go further and use "unstable-" as the prefix instead of "!"
> > which is way more explicit.
> 
> I guess unstable- is as good as anything. I personally think that "!" is
> disturbing enough to the eye to make it abundantly clear that something
> is fishy.

"!" marks the binding as "special" whatever that is. A busy person might
decide to not look that up as long as it works right now. "unstable-"
(or maybe "unstable!-" ;)) is explicit so people know what they get.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux