On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 08:46:22PM +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote: > > the first iteration of your DTB would be incomplete, the bindings to > describe that hardware block would not exist inside it. > > real life example with Marvell Kirkwood, hw crypto support was added 1 > year after initial SOC support. > > I'm happy I can use it now on existing boards by "just" upgrading the > kernel. I have no problem with new kernel features unlocked by new DT bindings. I *do* have a problem with new kernels breaking existing DT bindings. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
