Hi Kishon, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > I think it makes sense to keep the data width property in the dwc2 node itself. > I mean it describes how the dwc2 IP is configured in that particular SoC (given > that it can be either <8> or <16>). If I'm reading the RT3052 datasheet correctly (GHWCFG4 register), the IP can be configured for 8, 16 or 8 _and_ 16. In the latter case, the "8 and 16 supported" would make sense as a property of dwc2 (though this value should be autodetectable through GHWCFG4), while the actual 8 or 16 supported by the PHY would make sense as property of a phy. Note sure if this is really useful in practice as well, or if just setting the actual width to use on dwc2 makes more sense... Gr. Matthijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature