Hi, > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:54:24PM +0200, Denis Carikli wrote: > > > > + if (ts->of) > > + return tsc2007_get_pendown_state_dt(ts); > > + > > if (!ts->get_pendown_state) > > return true; > > Instead of special casing "if (ts->of)" all over the place why don't you > set up the device structure as: > > if (<configuring_tsc2007_form_dt>) > ts->get_pendown_state = tsc2007_get_pendown_state_dt; > > and be done with it? > I also thought about that, but the existing function does not have any parameters, while the DT version of get_pendown_state() requires to get the GPIO passed to it somehow. Lothar Waßmann -- ___________________________________________________________ Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10 Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996 www.karo-electronics.de | info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ___________________________________________________________ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
