On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jiří Prchal <jiri.prchal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 18.10.2013 12:36, Mark Rutland napsal(a): >> If there is information associated with the GPIO pins themselves, that >> should be described in the GPIO bindings. If we want to export named >> pins in sysfs, that is the duty of the GPIO framework and GPIO drivers. >> I do not believe having a binding for a non-device that exists solely to >> express a naming preference makes any sense. > > > I realy don't understan it, isn't it done in GPIO framework? Please, coul'd > you explain it more. I think what Mark is saying is that you should not define a new node for exports, but instead use the node for the gpiochip and extend those existing gpiochip bindings, if you want to do this. I.e. you should be patching this file in the end: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
