On 17/10/13 15:19, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 10:33 Thu 17 Oct , srinivas kandagatla wrote: >> On 17/10/13 08:27, Maxime COQUELIN wrote: >>> ... >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +static struct of_device_id st_i2c_match[] = { >>>>>>> + { .compatible = "st,comms-ssc-i2c", }, >>>>> the rules is to put the first soc that use the ip in the compatible >>>>> as st,sti7100-scc-i2c >>> Ok. There are no plans to upstream the SH4 platforms, it will only >>> remains in stlinux.com. >>> Maybe I can set the first ARM platform (STiH415)? >>> That would give st,stih415-ssc-i2c. >> NAK, for st,stih415-ssc-i2c naming. >> >> IMO, this makes sense when the same IP integration done on different SOC >> changes slightly/very differently. >> >> But in this case the "comms" IP remains unchanged across all the SOCs. >> >> I would still prefer "st,comms-ssc-i2c", allowing a single device driver >> to match against several SoCs. ST "comms" IP it is integrated across all >> the STi series of SoCs, so we don't want to add new entry in compatible >> for every new SOC. > > you never need this you always the first SoC that's all Sorry to ask this but, Where is this requirement coming from? I have not spotted any thing as such in ePAPR specs. All the spec says is. === The compatible property value consists of one or more strings that define the specific programming model for the device. This list of strings should be used by a client program for device driver selection. The property value consists of a concatenated list of null terminated strings, *from most specific to most general.* They allow a device to express its compatibility with a family of similar devices, potentially allowing a single device driver to match against several devices. The recommended format is “manufacturer,model”, where manufacturer is a string describing the name of the manufacturer (such as an OUI), and model specifies the model number. Example: compatible = “fsl,mpc8641-uart”, “ns16550"; In this example, an operating system would first try to locate a device driver that supported fsl,mpc8641-uart. If a driver was not found, it would then try to locate a driver that supported the more general ns16550 device type. === The more general compatible string in this case is "st,comms-ssc-i2c", rather than the first soc name. How can a first SOC name be more general? As this driver is not very specific to StiH415, it is generic driver for ST comms-ssc-i2c block. Thanks, srini > > see other bindings on at91 as example sorry NACK > > Best Regards, > J. >> >> >> Thanks, >> srini >> >>> >>> Thanks for the review, >>> Maxime >>> >>>>> >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html