On Oct 12, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: > This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard > which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family. > For now, just support a basic machine with device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 ++- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts | 6 +++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig | 13 ++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c | 9 +++++++ > 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > index 000cf76..e71a3ec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_KIRKWOOD) += kirkwood-cloudbox.dtb \ > kirkwood-openblocks_a6.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MARCO) += marco-evb.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \ > - msm8960-cdp.dtb > + msm8960-cdp.dtb \ > + qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \ > armada-370-mirabox.dtb \ > armada-370-netgear-rn102.dtb \ > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..13ac3e2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +#include "qcom-msm8974.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard"; > + compatible = "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard", "qcom,apq8074"; > +}; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e0fd55a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/dts-v1/; > + > +#include "skeleton.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "Qualcomm MSM8974"; > + compatible = "qcom,msm8974"; > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > + > + soc: soc { }; Was there an answer to Olof's question about: For files that include this it's ok to use the &phandle syntax, but in this base dtsi, please use proper structure. In other words, move the contents of the soc node up above instead. > +}; > + > +&soc { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > + > + intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000 { > + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2"; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > + reg = <0xf9000000 0x1000>, > + <0xf9002000 0x1000>; > + }; > + > + timer { > + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer"; > + interrupts = <1 2 0xf08>, > + <1 3 0xf08>, > + <1 4 0xf08>, > + <1 1 0xf08>; > + clock-frequency = <19200000>; > + }; > +}; - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html