On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:41:57PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/15/2013 08:52 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > As the clock IDs are now specified in a header file, we can use those > > definitions instead of maintaining an internal enum. > > Nit: The patch subject should say "clk: tegra:" not "clk: tegra20:" so > that anyone looking at the tags in the subject has only one "tegra" > value to look at, not a whole bunch of them. > > Would it make sense to squash patches 15, 16, 18 together (and similar > for Tegra30) to avoid some churn i.e. the fact that the entire body of > tegra_periph_clk_list[] gets replaced twice? You mean do all the changes for Tegra20 and Tegra30 in 1 patch per SoC? Cheers, Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
