On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 06:24:39PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> IRQ with number 0 is valid case, so check for negative
not entirelly correct... IRQ 0 isn't supposed to be used as a linux IRQ
number IIRC.
> numbers instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
> index ca2abe6..f34c8a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
> @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ static int __init msm_otg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "OTG regs = %p\n", motg->regs);
>
> motg->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (!motg->irq) {
> + if (motg->irq < 0) {
this check is correct though, since platform_get_irq() will return
-ENXIO if it doesn't find IRQ resource.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
