On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Tero Kristo wrote: > Well, even if you sign something, you can still update it. Writing any > software to true OTP memory is one way to commit suicide IMO. How many nasty > bugs have you seen with ROM code? Also, if people want to make their custom > security solutions which are not supported by the kernel, why should the > kernel care about it? We don't know the details, and can't influence the > design, so we can't prepare for it anyway. The point is that newer kernels need to be compatible with older DT data: that's the "stable ABI" criterion that's been discussed quite a bit. The worst-case scenario if the bindings are at a top-level node and not fully cooked is that it can make it very difficult, if not impossible, to have this forward compatibility for the DT data without having extremely nasty hacks. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
