On 7 October 2013 17:12, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry I didn't notice this previously, but "moxa" isn't in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt (despite several > bindings using it). Could you cook up a separate patch to add an entry > for Moxa, please? Yes, I'll submit a separate patch. > Also, given the SoC is called "ART" it's a shame that we're calling this > "moxa,moxart-dma" rather than "moxa,art-dma". We already have precedent > for "moxart" in bindings though, so changing that's likely to lead to > more problems. Sorry about that, I think the "moxart" contraction was suggested and has been sticky ever since. It's at least a little appropriate because the physical chip text reads "MOXA ART" (photo): https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-A-2FXDrObU8/UMcMc_K2vEI/AAAAAAAABwg/ldaLZ7ps1P4/w1331-h998-no/UC-7112-LX-picture4.jpg Currently three drivers in linux-next use the name with accompanying device tree bindings. Considering the amount of patches required, can we keep the name, please? > Sorry for yet more pendantry, but could we instead have: > > - interrupts: Should contain an interrupt-specifier for the sole > interrupt generated by the device. Fixed in v11. Regards, Jonas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
