Hi Bjorn, > Hi Georgi, > > Thanks for working on this, unfortunately it seems like I need to port > the rpm regulators to be able to test this. > But I did find that... > Yes, the regulators support is still missing upstream. Until then, a basic testing can be done by bypassing the regulators init part in order to use the power on defaults for regulators and maybe also clocks. > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ... >> +static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data) >> +{ >> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = (struct sdhci_msm_host *)data; >> ... >> +static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct sdhci_host *host; >> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host; >> ... >> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, msm_host->pwr_irq, >> NULL, >> + sdhci_msm_pwr_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT, >> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), host); >> ... > > ...sdhci_msm_pwr_irq() expects the data pointer to be msm_host, not > sdhci_host, so right now I only get a panic. So I suspect you mean > msm_host as the last param here. Yes, you are right, I have also noticed this and it is fixed in the next version which i will be posting in the next few days. Thanks! BR, Georgi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html