Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PM / OPP: extend DT binding to specify phandle of another node for OPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/03/2013 08:05 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
[...]
>> However, could you squash this to patch #2 -> having implementation
>> and binding together is better for git log history.
>>
> Based on some arguments on the other threads[1] on devicetree list, I thought
> having separate patches for binding and driver changes is preferred. Hence the
> split, I am OK either way.
Thanks for pointing the discussion out.

/me might rant about this ;) -> if someone has a strong opinion about
this, they should probably propose a change to submitting patches
guideline.. Grr..

I leave this to Rafael as to how he'd like this to be squashed/split

> 
> Can I add your ACK/Reviewed-by otherwise ?
> 
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> 
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg04855.html
> 


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux