Hi, On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:41:53PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 10/02/2013 04:11 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:11:30PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > >> Hi Felipe, > >> > >> On 09/18/2013 03:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > >>> "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is an optional functional clock to the > >>> UBS_OTG_SS module. So manage it in the driver. > >>> > >> > >> Just realized that "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is in fact functional clock to the > >> PHY and not USB_OTG_SS module. The name is misleading. > >> > >> So please ignore patch 9 and 10. > > > > ignored. All others are fine, right ? > > > Yes. But I might have to rebase this on top of Phy framework stuff. alright, Greg already took the PHY framework, so maybe we need to just give him my Acked-by and he takes the patches directly as I don't have PYH framework. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
