On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:54:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:54:20PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > I would expect the schema to replace > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/* over time. I think the thing that > > needs to be worked out here is how to add free form multi-line text. > I'm not convinced that's a realistic goal. As I see it, the > fundamental difference between a binding document and a formal schema > is that a binding defines both the syntax required of a node, and its > semantics, whereas a schema defines only syntax - the semantics still > need to be defined somewhere. So long as the schema lets you include free form text to define the semantics I'm not sure there's an incompatibility there - the same document can cover both.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
