> >
> > Benoit,
> >
> > Sorry, I meant to ask earlier but forgot.
> > Shouldn't this development be based on the
> > upstream DTC repository and not the in-kernel
> > copy of the DTC?
>
> Eventually, yes,
We should *start* there, though.
> but here the main point is to discuss the schema that
> will be used to defined bindings.
> In that case, the DTC patches code are mostly a proof of concept
Sure; all that is fine.
> using the Linux kernel as example.
Example?(*) We shouldn't churn the kernel.
jdl
(*) In the sense that *this* Universe is just
one example from all known Universes? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
