On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:05:07PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 01.10.2013 16:01, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Isn't it the same as the existing 'gpio-key,wakeup' ? > Of course, I know the gpio-input driver can provide similar > functionality. My intention was just provide a way to wake up the system > without registering an input device for signals nobody is interested in > eventually. > Don't know if that's reason enough to add a new driver though. It does seem somewhat sensible - the signal might not have a sensible representation as an input device and the gpio-keys binding needs one.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
