Re: device tree binding documentation outdated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 04:19:00PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> brd: module loaded
> loop: module loaded
> imx6dl-pinctrl 20e0000.iomuxc: maps: function enet group enetgrp-4 num 19
> ar8035_phy_fixup()
> libphy: fec_enet_mii_bus: probed
> fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: registered PHC device 0
> 
> So where is the pinctrl settings applied - or more to the point, why
> aren't they being applied?  This would probably explain why ethernet
> doesn't work - I mean, if the pinctrl settings are never written to
> the registers...

I found that.  A typo in the DT file.  pintctrl-names.  Clearly beer
is required.

(And that's also a good argument why we need a schema language to
verify DT bindings against.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux