On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:57:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We shouldn't have any Linux-specific bindings. It might be reasonable to > > define a binding for a "simple CODEC", but there's no reason it should > > be Linux-specific. > Further, just define the type of codec h/w. If linux can use its > simple-codec driver for it, then add a match table entry for said > codec. Then the DT is future proof when you decide the simple driver > doesn't really work for that h/w. So, this is what I keep telling people to do but lots of people don't want to do this - it eliminates the need have this binding at all since if you know which type of device you have there's no need to specify fixed properties of the device via DT.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
