On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:33:53PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
"ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that any
node that has a reg property must include a unit address in its name
with value matching the first entry in its reg property. Conversely, if
a node does not have a reg property, the node name must not include a
unit address."
The soc node we have does not have a reg property ?
Not 100% sure what people will decide on this. There are a number of
examples on the PPC side (arch/powerpc/boot/dts) that are soc@ADDR,
but they don't typically have "reg" properties at the soc level.
Let's go ahead w/o the unit address (as you have it) for now.
What is the address even supposed to mean? Are we expecting multiple
'soc' nodes?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
