Dear Ezequiel Garcia, On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:00:11 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hm... could be. Considering the lack of hardware details (as you > point out) maybe this is indeed the best option. > > And it has the cool advantage of simplfying the clock tree, which > is unnecessarily complex with the NAND ECC clock -> NAND clock layout. > > On the other side, Emilio has just pointed out (in private) that > there's a flag "CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT" that is meant for these cases. > > Anyway, I feel inclined to your suggestion and just forget about the > NAND ECC clock for good, which is only confusing. Yes, I also believe it's the easiest solution. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
