On Wednesday 25 September 2013 01:50 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Santosh Shilimkar > <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Mike, >> >> On Thursday 29 August 2013 03:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> v2: >>> - Aligned the bindings as per the list discussion. Removed the additional >>> parameters by usage of reg-names and additional compatible fields. >>> - Addressed all the comments from v1 on drivers. >>> - Split the series into clock drivers($subject series) and >>> platform, dt updates. Will post that one separately. >>> >>> Special thanks to Mike and Mark for the detailed review on v1. >>> >>> Series is an attempt to add the clock drivers for Keystone SOCs >>> based on common clock framework. A PLL drivers taking care of >>> SOC PLLs and a gate control driver taking clock management for >>> the IPs. The current Keystone based SOCs don' support dynamic power >>> management usecases like DVFS, SOC ilde etc and hence most of the >>> usage is limited to enabling clocks and finding the current clock >>> rate etc. >>> >>> Based on to of Mike's dt binding series [1] and tested on Keystone2 >>> EVM. >>> >>> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> As aligned off-list, I will revise the series to remove the >> dependency with your DT bindings series which still seems to >> be under discussion. > > ACK. I plan to refresh my DT bindings and make them more concise, but > I still think it is wise if you do not rely on them. As we discussed > you can switch over to those bindings at any point in the future if > you wish. > Sounds good. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
