[replying to self] Any further comments on this series ? If not, I think bindings are ready to be queued, but for that I need acks from DT maintainers. The issue with in kernel dts that (re)-need patching owing to re-introduction of reg property on pre-v7 UP is still pending. Please advise, thank you very much, Lorenzo On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:21:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > This is v2 of a previous posting: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/192322.html > > - v2 changes > - Removed single core cpu-map example > - Removed OS dependency from cpus/cpu bindings > - Updated Marvell compatible strings > - Clarified behaviour on pre ARM v7 uniprocessor systems and updated > examples > > This patch resumes DT topology/cpu bindings discussions for ARM that were > started here: > > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/031725.html > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/032450.html > > Comments welcome, thanks, > Lorenzo > > Lorenzo Pieralisi (2): > Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates > Documentation: DT: arm: define CPU topology bindings > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 391 +++++++++++++++-- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 474 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 818 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt > > -- > 1.8.2.2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
