Re: new cpu iteration code...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:44:04 +0100

> Makes sense, but as you mentioned before we need to match other property
> names namely "upa-portid", "portid" or "cpuid" for cpu physical id right
> ? Are all these 32-bit values ?

Yes they are.  You'll simply have to make the property name string
to use be something an architecture can define.

>> I already gave a solution to this problem, make the loop iterator be:
>> 
>> 	for_each_node_by_type(dp, "cpu")
>> 
> 
> Does it make sense use this only when /cpus is not found ?

No, it should be used universally since it is an implementation that
should work in all possible layouts.

I do not buy your argument about cost at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux