Re: Adding aliases to mmc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/20/2013 10:37 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Am 20.09.2013 18:05, schrieb Stephen Warren:
>> On 09/18/2013 11:22 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> ...
>>> If you have an embedded system were you just care a little about boot
>>> time you don't want to do anything like U-Boot's "part uuid" every time
>>> you boot. Or even worse, you just have a minimalistic boot loader (e.g.
>>> U-Boot's SPL) which doesn't know anything about UUIDs and file systems.
>>>
>>> As mentioned above, no I don't think UUIDs work for production embedded
>>> systems.
>>
>> As I said above, whatever generates the filesystem image can easily
>> embed the appropriate UUID in the system's boot scripts or bootloader
>> environment. There's no need to run the "part" command at run-time if
>> there's a more appropriate flow for your situation.
> 
> Using a simple boot loader as an example, there are no boot scripts or
> boot loader environment. The only thing the boot loader does is loading
> the device tree and the kernel into RAM. Where do you want to embed an
> UUID in such a product?

I think the initrd would be typical.

> To my understanding, the UUID is different for each SD card/eMMC, correct?

Yes by default.

Although for an embedded product with a fixed eMMC, there's no reason
you couldn't make every device have the same UUID for the fixed device.
Obviously you wouldn't want to do that for any removable device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux