On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:18:22AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [130920 08:52]: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > > > The platform data bits can be inferred from the other members of > > > struct usbhs_phy_data. So get rid of the platform_data member. > > > > > > Build the platform data for the PHY device in usbhs_init_phys() instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > > > > Tony, do I get your Acked-by here and all following arch/arm/mach-omap2* > > patches in this series ? > > If you can merge just this series without the .dts changes > into an immutable topic branch against let's say v3.12-rc2 > when it comes out, then yes I can ack them: > > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > That way I can also pull in the topic branch as needed to > avoid self inflicted merge conflicts ;) And Benoit can > set up a separate .dts branch based on your branch to make > sure the dependencies are in place before merging that one > upstream. Alright, i'll put this in my todo for next week. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
