Re: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 13:41 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Also, maybe warn for @0x<foo>, which is another unpreferred syntax, it
> should just be @<foo> (with foo being in hex).

It can also bee @foo,bar, it doesn *have* to match the exact content of
the reg property first entry. In fact it's not uncommon to use a 64-bit
value here on 64-bit processors and pci uses a different encoding scheme
(on real OFW at least) where they typically do @dev,fn

Yes, the fact that the unit address is not something deterministic is
and has always been a major PITA though.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux