On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx> >> >> Hi, >> >> The cache bindings are generic and used by many other architectures >> apart from PPC. These patches fixes and move the existing definition >> of of_find_next_cache_node to DT common code. >> >> Regards, >> Sudeep > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures > yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series.. > Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea to combine it as its still initial RFC version. Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
