On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:43:08 -0700, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 09:12 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >> > >> Fixing those issues requires further discussion. Frankly, right now I > >> really have no idea which way should I go. The /reserved-ranges node seems > >> to be easy to match particular reserved memory region with a given device. > >> I'm also not really convinced if it makes sense to add a code for finding > >> and matching a reserved memory region to every device driver, which might > >> need it. I would really like to get some more feedback on the Ben's > >> comment. > >> > >> In any case, the code will also change significantly, so I assume that the > >> best, what can be done now is to revert the current version and start from > >> the scratch with a new, complete proposal. > > > > Yes, let's do that. I will try to help. It shouldn't be that a big deal. > > I think we can get the concerns sorted quickly. I'm at meetings all > day today in SJC, but I'll take a look at it this evening. I'll be in > Edinburgh. We're holding an ARM summit at the same time so a bunch of > affected ARM folks will be there. After reading through the entirety of the other thread, I think this can be fixed. My preference would be to fix in now rather than waiting another cycle. If you haven't sent the revert yet then please hold off for a bit (I can't tell at the moment since I'm currently on an airplane and I didn't update my tree before leaving the ground). g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html