On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 15:48 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: >> > A node that has a "reg" property should have the corresponding unit >> > address. >> >> No, absolutely _NOT_ a requirement. Unit address is only required if >> needed to disambiguate two properties with the same name. >> >> If there are no ambiguities, then leaving off the unit address is much >> preferred. > > I disagree :-) Well, good thing you've got your own arch to litter the device trees with unit specifiers in then. :) > Also this would be only true of our find_node_by_path was capable of > handling it, which it isn't. Thus you end up with generic code looking > for /memory and finding nothing ... Yes, this should be fixed. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
