On Monday, September 16, 2013 6:02 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:54:32PM +0800, Sean Cross wrote:
> > >>@@ -116,6 +116,22 @@
> > >> arm,data-latency = <4 2 3>;
> > >> };
> > >>+ pcie: pcie@0x01000000 {
> > >>+ compatible = "fsl,imx6-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> > >We generally use particular SoC name to specify the compatible string.
> > >So "fsl,imx6q-pcie" will be more appropriate.
> > Any reason to specify imx6q in particular? It's also present on the
> > imx6d, imx6dl, and imx6s (basically, everything but the imx6sl).
>
> The compatible naming is not about coverage but versioning. We
> generally encode the name of the SoC that firstly integrates the block
> to specify the version.
>
Yes, you're right. :-)
The name of the first SoC would be used.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
