On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
My original request to please use a common prefix for your product
families stands. Please prefix with msm-*, or if you have to, qcom-*
instead, since you guys can't seem to make your mind up on standard
prefixes (msm, apq, etc).
This is silly, I dont see the reason to go with
qcom-apq<SOC>-<BOARD>.dts and than in the future drop qcom- when we
mostly likely shift to a dir structure. As engineers we are all too
aware of the lack of sanity in marketing names, but its what we have
so we have to live with it.
At least what we'd decided a year or two ago was to call _everything_
with an msm* prefix. If marketing comes up with cute prefixes for
things, we would basically ignore them. So, under that, it should be
an msm8074-dragonboard. Admittedly, it might be a little confusing
with the name of the product having the apq in it, but as others have
pointed out, I think there is less confusing than not having a common
prefix on our MSM products.
At least so far, there are no chips where apq vs msm actually
distinguishes anything. In fact, a simple "decoder ring" would point
out that the 'apq' usually corresponds with the second digit being a
zero. It doesn't help that we've added an 'mpq' prefix as well.
I don't really see how to satisfy all of this other than qcom-apq*, or
just continue to use msm*.
David
--
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
