Hi On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx> > > Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) > appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. > > This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. > > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 23 ++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.= > c > index ad1fde2..5b05c26 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > @@ -174,29 +174,17 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cpu0_cpufreq_driver =3D = > { > =20 > static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > -=09struct device_node *np, *parent; > +=09struct device_node *np; > =09int ret; > =20 > -=09parent =3D of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); > -=09if (!parent) { > -=09=09pr_err("failed to find OF /cpus\n"); > -=09=09return -ENOENT; > -=09} > - > -=09for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) { > -=09=09if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points", NULL)) > -=09=09=09break; > -=09} > +=09cpu_dev =3D &pdev->dev; > =20 > +=09np =3D of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node); Has this actually been tested? This seems to break cpufreq-cpu0. The reason is, that this probe function is called not for the DT CPU node, but for a special virtual cpufreq-cpu0 platform device, typically created by platforms, using platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-cpu0", -1, NULL, 0); which then of course doesn't have on .of_node associated with it. Thanks Guennadi > =09if (!np) { > =09=09pr_err("failed to find cpu0 node\n"); > -=09=09ret =3D -ENOENT; > -=09=09goto out_put_parent; > +=09=09return -ENOENT; > =09} > =20 > -=09cpu_dev =3D &pdev->dev; > -=09cpu_dev->of_node =3D np; > - > =09cpu_reg =3D devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "cpu0"); > =09if (IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) { > =09=09/* > @@ -269,15 +257,12 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device = > *pdev) > =09} > =20 > =09of_node_put(np); > -=09of_node_put(parent); > =09return 0; > =20 > out_free_table: > =09opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table); > out_put_node: > =09of_node_put(np); > -out_put_parent: > -=09of_node_put(parent); > =09return ret; > } > =20 > --=20 > 1.8.1.2 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html