On 09/05/2013 08:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> [...] >>> compatbile=marvell,pxa25x-pwm , no ? The lowest CPU with the block. >> >> Unless I am missing something, the compatible string does not need to >> replicate any of the existing platform_device_id names, so wouldn't >> "marvell,pxa" be better? Except for register mapping and the number of >> units present on a particular pxa variant, the peripheral is software >> compatible across all pxa processors. Plus there is the problem of the >> 'x' wildcard in "pxa25x-pwm". > > So use pxa250 ? > > My concern is once marvell comes up with PXA1048576 which will have a different > PWM unit, then what will be the name for this new one? I see. OK then, pxa250 it is. Thanks Marek, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
