On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add error reporting to of_amba_device_create() so the user knows > when (and why) some device tree nodes fail to initialize. > > Also while at it fix the function to return an error value on error. > > [ The issue was spotted on Universal C210 board (using revision 0 of > ARM Exynos4210 SoC) on which initialization was silently failing > for PL330 MDMA1 device tree node (it was using the wrong addres > resulting in amba_device_add() returning -ENODEV). ] > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/of/platform.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c > index b0d1ff8..cab4d0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c > @@ -264,8 +264,11 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node, > return NULL; > > dev = amba_device_alloc(NULL, 0, 0); > - if (!dev) > - return NULL; > + if (!dev) { > + pr_err("%s(): amba_device_alloc() failed for %s\n", > + __func__, node->full_name); > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); Don't change the return value here. This function does not use the ERR_PTR() pattern. The message to the kernel log is sufficient. > + } > > /* setup generic device info */ > dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = ~0; > @@ -290,18 +293,24 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node, > dev->irq[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, i); > > ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &dev->res); > - if (ret) > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("%s(): of_address_to_resource() failed (%d) for %s\n", > + __func__, ret, node->full_name); > goto err_free; > + } > > ret = amba_device_add(dev, &iomem_resource); > - if (ret) > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("%s(): amba_device_add() failed (%d) for %s\n", > + __func__, ret, node->full_name); > goto err_free; > + } > > return dev; > > err_free: > amba_device_put(dev); > - return NULL; > + return ERR_PTR(ret); Ditto here. Don't change the pattern. Otherwise this patch looks okay. If you respin it then I can pick it up for v3.12 > } > #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */ > static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node, > @@ -374,7 +383,11 @@ static int of_platform_bus_create(struct device_node *bus, > } > > if (of_device_is_compatible(bus, "arm,primecell")) { > - of_amba_device_create(bus, bus_id, platform_data, parent); > + /* > + * Don't return an error here to keep compatibility with older > + * device tree files. > + */ > + (void)of_amba_device_create(bus, bus_id, platform_data, parent); Adding he comment is fine, but why is this line being changed? > return 0; > } > > -- > 1.8.2.3 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html