On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:02:27PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > it is referring the same differences Russell already mentioned. But I > already came to the conclusion, that we don't need the information in > the binding. For example, if you use that controller on Dove and you > hook it up for SPDIF-in (which it hasn't), than I consider this a > DT bug. No need to double-check that in the driver. From that p-o-v, > please just let the current binding as is. OK, great - none of these devices have any differences which are visible only within the controller, they're all extra external interfaces? > Thomas Petazzoni mentioned earlier, that the _usual_ procedure to > name the compatibles is to pick the SoC that the IP appeared in first. > But I am also fine with "marvell,mvebu-audio" and adding compatibles > for dove or kirkwood _if_ we will ever need them. Yeah, it doesn't make much difference either way so long as the base name isn't utterly confusing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
