Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: VDD CORE OPP50 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:47:04AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > So this is done from cpuidle rather than system suspend.

> It is done for system suspend. It isn't possible to do this in a
> cpuidle use case as the memory controller would need to come out of
> idle automatically to service DMA requests.

OK, so it's all part of the core power down sequence for the SoC?  I'm
not sure that makes a big difference but it at least means that there
are fewer runtime interactions to worry about.

> > I mean describe the intended sequence of events in the system rather
> > than the raw register commands to accomplish them.

> I'm still not sure what you mean.

Say "set voltage X" or even "regulator X supplies Y" not "send this
bytestream to the device".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux