On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:42:22 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > +===================================== > +cpus and cpu node bindings definition > +===================================== > + > +The ARM architecture, in accordance with the ePAPR, requires the cpus and cpu > +nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. > + > +- cpus node > + > + Description: Container of cpu nodes > + > + The node name must be "cpus". > + > + A cpus node must define the following properties: > + > + - #address-cells > + Usage: required > + Value type: <u32> > + > + Definition depends on ARM architecture version and > + configuration: > + > + # On uniprocessor ARM architectures previous to v7 > + value must be 0, since they have no register > + providing CPU identification. Just clued into this point from the other thread; Don't do this. Uniprocessor should follow the same rules as 32bit or 64bit for the value of #address-cells, and cpu nodes should have a reg property, even if it is merely set to '0'. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
