Hello Boris, 2013/8/27 boris brezillon <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hello Dave, > > > On 26/08/2013 22:04, David Miller wrote: >> >> From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:20 +0200 >> >>> This patch series adds support for ethernet phy definition using device >>> tree. >>> >>> This may help in moving some at91 boards to dt (some of them define an >>> interrupt pin). >>> >>> Tested on samad31ek. >> >> Series applied to net-next, thanks. > > Could you apply, the 3rd version of this series instead ? > > It fixes one bug when no phy is discovered and use the appropriate address > for the phy dt node. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. You will probably have to resubmit an incremental patch, I have never seen David pick up another version of a patch once it has been pushed out: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=8c038e7e14b1c5f156745e3c4df0a3aa46173dd9 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=148cbb53ace32f584d208764c7f7e6aa8edb970c -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
