On Monday 26 August 2013 at 13:29:07, Andreas Larsson wrote:
> On 2013-08-26 12:56, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> > Hi Andreas!
> >
> > On Thursday 22 August 2013 at 15:16:18, Andreas Larsson wrote:
> >> On 2013-08-21 15:38, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> >>> +static void of_gpio_scan_irq_lines(const struct device_node *const
> >>> node, + struct device_node *const gcn,
> >>> + struct irq_domain *const irq_domain,
> >>> + const u32 intsize,
> >>> + const struct gpio_chip * const gc,
> >>> + bool request)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct device_node *child;
> >>> + struct device_node *irq_parent;
> >>> + const __be32 *intspec;
> >>> + u32 intlen;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> + int i;
> >>> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> >>> + unsigned int type;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (node == NULL)
> >>> + return;
> >>> +
> >>> + for_each_child_of_node(node, child) {
> >>> + of_gpio_scan_irq_lines(child, gcn, irq_domain, intsize, gc,
> >>> + request);
> >>> + /* Check if we have an IRQ parent, else continue */
> >>> + irq_parent = of_irq_find_parent(child);
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> This call to of_irq_find_parent breaks gpiolib-of for SPARC due to
> >> the fact that the function is undefined when !defined(CONFIG_OF_IRQ)
> >> && defined(CONFIG_OF).
> >>
> >> Defining the empty of_irq_find_parent in include/linux/of_irq.h when
> >> !defined(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) instead of the current case when
> >> !defined(CONFIG_OF) would solve the immediate compilation problem.
> >
> > Is this a bug and should be fixed ?
>
> Well, at least as soon as anyone tries to use in a context that does not
> exclude SPARC it creates a bug, so I would say so. There is no reason
> for SPARC to fall between the chairs. This is the first case I am aware
> of that triggers this.
I also think this should be fixed.
Are you able to do a patch that fixes this and submit to the relevant
people?
Regards,
Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
