Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: add support to specify phandle of another node for OPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 20/08/13 15:01, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 05:00 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
[...]
>> Until we get more feedback and agreement on new proposal can we have
>> this simple amendment in this patch to the existing binding ? Since the
>> new proposal[1] is backward compatible(this patch adding support for
>> option#5 to existing option#1), we will have to add support for other
>> binding options in [1] later.
>>
>> This is needed to support shared OPPs with simple/single OPP profile
>> and also to fix the broken and unused binding
>> @Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.txt
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sudeep
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg06563.html
> 
> 
> Could you post a non-RFC version of this series? As I had mentioned
> earlier in the thread, I dont mind having this pulled in as stage 1 of
> the transition to a more elaborate solution.
> 
Thanks Nishanth. I would wait till Mark and Stephen agree for this approach.

Regards,
Sudeep

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux