RE: RE: [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Mike Turquette wrote:
> 

[...]

> > OK, if new branch is ready, I will replace with that or if re-merge is
> > required, I will. Either way, I'm fine and can handle. Mike, let me know
> > your choice :-)
> 
> Since I have already published it let's just go with the delta patch.  I
> can create another stable branch named clk-next-s3c64xx-delta that just
> has this patch on top of clk-next-s3c64xx OR I can apply it on top of
> the existing clk-next-s3c64xx and re-merge it.
> 
Sounds good to me. If the branch for the delta is ready, let me know.

> I'm trying to think on whether there are any weird git corner cases with
> re-merging clk-next-s3c64xx. Let me know if re-merging is somehow unsafe
> (makes history weird, or whatever).
> 
I don't think it causes some problem.

> Let me know what option is better for you. I'll publish as soon as I get
> the delta patch. Apologies again for creating some extra work!
> 
No problem.

Thanks,
Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux