On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:57:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Tom Rini wrote: > > On 08/14/2013 08:37 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Tom Rini wrote: [snip] > Well, the hard guideline should require that the DTB be updateable and > not linked with nor generated by the bootloader or firmware. That > implies some storage separate from the bootloader but this doesn't need > to be a filesystem. Wait, what!? Much as I think a bunch of the current problems have been caused by being overly keen to push the dtb into firmware, we shouldn't *ban* the original Open Firmware model of the device tree, where it is generated by the firmware and consumed by the OS. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
pgpxJMn0tAEdQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
