On 15.08.2013 15:39, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
>> Hmm, and you don't like the approach either of having upstream ports and
>> assign users to it via phandles?
>
> I don't know what that means, sorry.
Well, we have the 'real' devices registered in DT like this:
ssp0: ssp@41000000 {
compatible = "mrvl,pxa3xx-ssp";
reg = <0x41000000 0x40>;
interrupts = <24>;
clock-names = "pxa27x-ssp.0";
dmas = <&dma 13
&dma 14>;
dma-names = "rx", "tx";
};
And users, in that case, a ssp DAI, just reference a port like so:
ssp_dai0: ssp_dai@0 {
compatible = "mrvl,pxa-ssp-dai";
port = <&ssp0>;
};
Is that something we can live with?
>> Also note that the last patch in that series ("ASoC: pxa: add DT
>> bindings for pxa2xx-pcm") can be omitted, as Lars pointed out. I'll have
>> to care for a proper solution at some point.
>
> I applied it since we were already adding a dummy device for the DAI. I
> can revert it if this work without that.
I'll send a cleanup patch once I have a better solution.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
