Thanks Mark for your comments.
On 15/08/13 09:49, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:27:01PM +0100, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch adds support to ST RC driver, which is basically a IR/UHF
>> receiver and transmitter. This IP is common across all the ST parts for
>> settop box platforms. IRB is embedded in ST COMMS IP block.
>> It supports both Rx & Tx functionality.
>>
>> In this driver adds only Rx functionality via LIRC codec.
>
> Is there anything that additionally needs to be in the dt to support Tx
> functionality?
We need an additional boolean property for TX enable.
+
Two more configurable parameters for TX sub-carrier frequency and
duty-cycle. By default driver can set the sub carrier frequency to be
38Khz and duty cycle as 50%.
However I don't have strong use case to make these configurable.
So, I think just one boolean property to enable tx should be Ok.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Hi Chehab,
>>
>> This is a very simple rc driver for IRB controller found in STi ARM CA9 SOCs.
>> STi ARM SOC support went in 3.11 recently.
>> This driver is a raw driver which feeds data to lirc codec for the user lircd
>> to decode the keys.
>>
>> This patch is based on git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master branch.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> srini
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st-rc.txt | 18 +
>> drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/media/rc/st_rc.c | 371 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st-rc.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/st_rc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st-rc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st-rc.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..57f9ee8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st-rc.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>> +Device-Tree bindings for ST IR and UHF receiver
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> + - compatible: should be "st,rc".
>
> That "rc" should be made more specific, and it seems like this is a
> subset of a larger block of IP (the ST COMMS IP block). Is this really a
> standalone piece of hardware, or is it always in the larger comms block?
COMMS block is a collection of communication peripherals, and IRB(Infra
red blaster) is always part of the COMMS block.
May renaming the compatible to "st,comms-rc" might be more clear.
>
> What's the full name of this unit as it appears in documentation?
It is always refered as the Communication sub-system (COMMS) which is a
collection of communication peripherals like UART, I2C, SPI, IRB.
>
>> + - st,uhfmode: boolean property to indicate if reception is in UHF.
>
> That's not a very clear name. Is this a physical property of the device
> (i.e. it's wired to either an IR receiver or a UHF receiver), or is this
> a choice as to how it's used at runtime?
Its both, some boards have IR and others UHF receivers, So it becomes
board choice here.
And also the driver has different register set for UHF receiver and IR
receiver. This options selects which registers to use depending on mode
of reception.
>
> If it's fixed property of how the device is wired, it might make more
> sense to have a string mode property that's either "uhf" or "infared".
Am ok with either approaches.
>
>> + - reg: base physical address of the controller and length of memory
>> + mapped region.
>> + - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu. The interrupt specifier
>> + format depends on the interrupt controller parent.
>> +
>> +Example node:
>> +
>> + rc: rc@fe518000 {
>> + compatible = "st,rc";
>> + reg = <0xfe518000 0x234>;
>> + interrupts = <0 203 0>;
>> + };
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/st_rc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,371 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 STMicroelectronics Limited
>> + * Author: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <media/rc-core.h>
>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>> +
>> +struct st_rc_device {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + int irq;
>> + int irq_wake;
>> + struct clk *sys_clock;
>> + void *base; /* Register base address */
>> + void *rx_base;/* RX Register base address */
>> + struct rc_dev *rdev;
>> + bool overclocking;
>> + int sample_mult;
>> + int sample_div;
>> + bool rxuhfmode;
>> +};
>
> [...]
>
>> +static void st_rc_hardware_init(struct st_rc_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + int baseclock, freqdiff;
>> + unsigned int rx_max_symbol_per = MAX_SYMB_TIME;
>> + unsigned int rx_sampling_freq_div;
>> +
>> + clk_prepare_enable(dev->sys_clock);
>
> This clock should be defined in the binding.
Clock is coming for the device tree only.
I can add the clock and pinctrl bindings to the documentation if it
makes it more clear.
>
>> + baseclock = clk_get_rate(dev->sys_clock);
>> +
>> + /* IRB input pins are inverted internally from high to low. */
>> + writel(1, dev->rx_base + IRB_RX_POLARITY_INV);
>> +
>> + rx_sampling_freq_div = baseclock / IRB_SAMPLE_FREQ;
>> + writel(rx_sampling_freq_div, dev->base + IRB_SAMPLE_RATE_COMM);
>> +
>> + freqdiff = baseclock - (rx_sampling_freq_div * IRB_SAMPLE_FREQ);
>> + if (freqdiff) { /* over clocking, workout the adjustment factors */
>> + dev->overclocking = true;
>> + dev->sample_mult = 1000;
>> + dev->sample_div = baseclock / (10000 * rx_sampling_freq_div);
>> + rx_max_symbol_per = (rx_max_symbol_per * 1000)/dev->sample_div;
>> + }
>> +
>> + writel(rx_max_symbol_per, dev->rx_base + IRB_MAX_SYM_PERIOD);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int st_rc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct st_rc_device *rc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(rc_dev->sys_clock);
>> + rc_unregister_device(rc_dev->rdev);
>
> Is a call to rc_free_device() not necessary?
>
> There are separate calls to rc_allocate_device() and rc_register_device
> in the probe function, and an rc_free_device() in its failure path.
>
rc_unregister_device does call rc_free_device as well.
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> [...]
>
>> +static int st_rc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>> + struct rc_dev *rdev;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + struct st_rc_device *rc_dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> + rc_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct st_rc_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + rdev = rc_allocate_device();
>> +
>> + if (!rc_dev || !rdev)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (np)
>> + rc_dev->rxuhfmode = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,uhfmode");
>
> I see of_property_read_bool has an implicit NULL check on np via
> __of_find_property, though I'm not sure if we want people to rely on
> that.
>
> I don't think a boolean property is the best way of encoding this,
> regardless.
Am ok to move to string property for this.
>
>> +
>> + rc_dev->sys_clock = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rc_dev->sys_clock)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "System clock not found\n");
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(rc_dev->sys_clock);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc_dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (rc_dev->irq < 0) {
>> + ret = rc_dev->irq;
>> + goto clkerr;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + if (!res)
>> + goto clkerr;
>> +
>> + rc_dev->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rc_dev->base))
>> + goto clkerr;
>> +
>> + if (rc_dev->rxuhfmode)
>> + rc_dev->rx_base = rc_dev->base + 0x40;
>> + else
>> + rc_dev->rx_base = rc_dev->base;
>> +
>> + rc_dev->dev = dev;
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rc_dev);
>> + st_rc_hardware_init(rc_dev);
>> +
>> + rdev->driver_type = RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW;
>> + rdev->allowed_protos = RC_TYPE_LIRC;
>> + rdev->priv = rc_dev;
>> + rdev->open = st_rc_open;
>> + rdev->close = st_rc_close;
>> + rdev->driver_name = IR_ST_NAME;
>> + rdev->map_name = RC_MAP_LIRC;
>> + rdev->input_name = "ST Remote Control Receiver";
>> +
>> + /* enable wake via this device */
>> + device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
>> + device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, true);
>> +
>> + ret = rc_register_device(rdev);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto clkerr;
>> +
>> + rc_dev->rdev = rdev;
>> + if (devm_request_irq(dev, rc_dev->irq, st_rc_rx_interrupt,
>> + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, IR_ST_NAME, rc_dev) < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "IRQ %d register failed\n", rc_dev->irq);
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto rcerr;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* for LIRC_MODE_MODE2 or LIRC_MODE_PULSE or LIRC_MODE_RAW
>> + * lircd expects a long space first before a signal train to sync. */
>
> Comment should be like:
Yep.. I missed this one...
>
> /*
> * Multi-line comment.
> * Preceding and trailing /
> */
>
>> + st_rc_send_lirc_timeout(rdev);
>> +
>> + dev_info(dev, "setup in %s mode\n", rc_dev->rxuhfmode ? "UHF" : "IR");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +rcerr:
>> + rc_unregister_device(rdev);
>> + rdev = NULL;
>
> Why? Doesn't that mean rdev never gets freed?
As its freed in rc_unregister_device().
Thanks,
srini
>
>> +clkerr:
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(rc_dev->sys_clock);
>> +err:
>> + rc_free_device(rdev);
>> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to register device (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
