On Aug 14, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/23/2013 03:19 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> The CCI PMU can profile bus transactions at the master and slave >> interfaces of the CCI. The PMU can be used to observe an aggregated view >> of the bus traffic between the various components connected to the CCI. >> >> Extend the existing CCI driver to support the PMU by registering a perf >> backend for it. >> >> Document the device tree binding to describe the CCI PMU. > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt > >> + - CCI PMU node >> + >> + Node name must be "pmu". > > I don't think the binding should require the node to have a particular > name; node names shouldn't be interpret/used/relied-upon by drivers. While I agree with that, we should be aiming for some convention and consistency with node names. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
