On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > There seems to be conflict in the new function "of_get_cpu_node" added. > PowerPC also defines the same function name. Further microblaze and > openrisc declares it(can be removed) but doesn't define it. > To fix this: > 1. I can rename the newly added function to something different like > `of_get_cpunode` or > 2. If of_* namespace should be used by only OF/FDT and not by any > architecture specific code, then the arch specific version can be > renamed to some thing like arch_of_get_cpu_node. > Also most of the calls to arch specific function can be moved to > generic code. > > Let me know your thoughts. What is your new function about ? Does it perform the same job as the one in powerpc ? If yes, make sure you have the same signature and either copy the powerpc one over to a generic place or make the generic one weak if you don't want the powerpc thread counting logic. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
