On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:18:34PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/12/2013 05:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >> (although I dare say that at least samsung,supports-rstclr should > >> be modified to use the new reset controller bindings) > > Really? That doesn't seem terribly sane - I had thought that was > > for bodging resets on the side of things that don't normally have > > them or need board specific logic. Also note that this is actually > > a magic register write done to reset the IP on some specific IPs. > I believe that's exactly what the reset subsystem and associated DT > bindings were designed for. That seems... interesting. It seems like this is fairly core device functionality I'd expect the driver to just be able to understand; the main thing this property was doing was deciding if the reset was needed. I'm not sure I see the benefit here?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
