On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: >> The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the >> usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that >> it should be <USB2-HS-PHY, USB3-SS-PHY>. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt >> index 7a95c65..8a9770b 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt >> @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ Required properties: >> - compatible: must be "synopsys,dwc3" >> - reg : Address and length of the register set for the device >> - interrupts: Interrupts used by the dwc3 controller. >> - - usb-phy : array of phandle for the PHY device >> + - usb-phy : array of phandle for the PHY device. The first element >> + in the array is expected to be a handle to the USB2/HS PHY and >> + the second element is expected to be a handle to the USB3/SS PHY > > Just to check - it's not valid to have a USB3 phy without a USB2 phy? Don't know, hopefully Felipe will chime in on that. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
