On 08.08.2013 15:20, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:39:59AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >> Then, we should also allocate the DMA channel from the upstream device >> and pass it down to the DAI. But then again, the pxa-pcm-lib needs some >> rework, as it's currently in charge of obtaining and releasing the channel. > >> I wanted to postpone that issue until the rest of the series has settled >> and limit changes to the bare minimum for now. Does that sound feasible? > > Yup, the big problem here is the whole DT as ABI thing - what happens in > the code isn't so important but the DT is supposed to be stable. Or we > could decide that this is one of the cases that's unstable in which case > we should probably flag it up in the DT binding document if nothing else. > Alright, I agreee. It's not much code that was needed to add support for what I proposed, so I added a patch for that to my queue. Thanks for the heads-up. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
